The many faces of informal enterprise
An informal approach to entrepreneurship is not only for small business owners who lack other options. Flexing between varying degrees of formality is the norm in many settings. ...
15 November 2021 • by Christos Cabolis, Karl Schmedders in Competitiveness
On the heels of the COP 26 UN Climate Change Conference there is global buzz about ESG goals, but many gaps remain between companies’ talk and their actions. ...
On the heels of the COP 26 UN Climate Change Conference there is global buzz about ESG goals, but many gaps remain between companies’ talk and their actions. Indeed, nearly half the executives who participated in our IMD webinar indicated they agreed with Greta Thunberg that “the COP 26 conference is just a big PR event”, or believed the goal of reducing temperature increases to 1.5°C by mid-century was on “life support”, as expressed by Antonio Guterres.
To avoid greenwashing and begin seeing real, measurable results we need to first fully understand the relationship between the E, the S and the G when we are discussing and setting our companies’ ESG goals.
E: Environmental: Considerations might include climate change mitigation and adaptation, as well as the environment more broadly, for instance the preservation of biodiversity, pollution prevention, and the circular economy.
S: Social: Considerations could refer to inequality, inclusiveness, labor relations, investment in human capital and communities, as well as human rights issues.
G: Governance: This refers to both public and private institutions, including management structures, employee relations, and executive remuneration. It plays a fundamental role in ensuring the inclusion of social and environmental considerations in the decision-making process.
In the broad discussion of these goals, social considerations are often the forgotten stepchild. People focus on the environmental concerns and how corporate governance can influence change or is failing to do so. But rarely do people look at the relationship between environmental and social concerns. In fact, more than two-thirds of participants in our IMD webinar indicated they believed there was a positive correlation between environment goals and social objectives. However, the opposite is often true.
Consider the yellow jacket protests in Paris. These demonstrations were sparked when carbon taxes were imposed on the French public. While the intent was to motivate people to change their behavior, the burden disproportionately affected low-wage workers who lived outside of Paris and relied on their cars to drive in and earn their livelihoods. These problems occur when we do not consider the social impact of environmental incentives, which often present differently for different socioeconomic groups. When you consider people who live from pay check to pay check, or even day to day, the choice between putting food on the table or doing the environmentally correct thing is clear.
Greenwashing is a term making its way more frequently into public discussion, because many companies are being exposed for making statements they simply don’t live up to. It is easy for a corporation to pledge to be carbon zero in 30 years because, frankly, the people saying that will likely be long retired by then. There is no accountability built into a lot of plans that are presented to the public. But even when the public gets upset about it, the incentive for accountability isn’t there.
One of the fundamental problems in getting businesses to change their behaviors is that the transition to a more environmentally sensitive world comes at a cost. ESG initiatives have a cost attached to them, which means lower profits. So what can be done to get companies to change?
Incentives are needed to change peoples’ behavior. This means regulation at the government level as well as the corporate level. Recent studies have indicated that more than 90% of companies don’t link compensation to ESG objectives. Tying a percentage of C-Suite compensation to hitting goals would be an effective way to ensure ESG goals are taken seriously.
Finally, we need to establish some metrics by which to measure the impact of ESG initiatives, because without measures to hold people accountable greenwashing is all too easy.
Chief Economist at the IMD World Competitiveness Center
Christos Cabolis is the IMD World Competitiveness Center’s Chief Economist and Head of Operations and Adjunct Professor of Economics and Competitiveness at IMD. His research focuses on competitiveness in its broadest sense, such as the challenges inherent to ESG and the need to respect citizens’ privacy in an increasingly digitalized world.
Professor of Finance at IMD
Karl Schmedders is a Professor of Finance, with research and teaching centered on sustainability and the economics of climate change. He is Director of IMD’s online certification course for structured investment and also teaches in the Executive MBA programs and serves as an advisor for International Consulting Projects within the MBA program. Passionate about sustainable finance, Schmedders believes that more attention needs to be paid to on the social (S) and governance (G) aspects of ESG to ensure a fair transition and tackle inequality.
20 September 2024 • by Esther Salvi, Frank-Martin Belz, Sophie Bacq in Sustainability • 7 min read
An informal approach to entrepreneurship is not only for small business owners who lack other options. Flexing between varying degrees of formality is the norm in many settings. ...
19 September 2024 • by Paul Strebel in Sustainability • 9 min read
Here are four key focus areas to ensure boards overcome the financial and competitive pressures that prevent companies from implementing sustainable capitalism ...
18 September 2024 • by Anca Mataoanu in Sustainability • 8 min read
Pension funds are shifting from traditional stocks and bonds to alternative investments like venture capital and private equity in an attempt to boost returns and reduce risk....
17 September 2024 • by Albrecht Enders in Sustainability • 6 min read
Lena Hök, Executive Vice President for Sustainability and Innovation at Skanska, explains how being a forerunner on sustainability has helped it set industry standards and win customers. ...
16 September 2024 • by André Brotto in Sustainability • 5 min read
The BRICS economic grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa are sitting in the catbird seat as the world’s wealthiest nations spend billions of dollars to transition their economies away...
13 September 2024 • by Carlos Cordon in Sustainability • 6 min read
Companies need a new, holistic approach to sustainability if they are to head off criticism and accusations of greenwashing....
10 September 2024 • by Arturo Bris in Sustainability • 6 min read
The former Italian premier and ECB president’s call for massive EU investment is a wake-up call to Europe’s economic stagnation. But can the continent afford the trade-offs he overlooks? ...
9 September 2024 • by Bala Mulloth, Jill Kickul, Tatiana Iakovleva in Sustainability • 8 min read
Innovation is a core element in the business toolbox. A new framework is helping corporate leaders integrate social sustainability in their innovation strategies...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience