![tc055-18_tl_1440x990.jpg - IMD Business School digital illustration - IMD Business School](https://www.imd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/tc055-18_tl_1440x990.jpg)
Is agility the latest management fad? Or not?
As a business school professor who deals with top management thinkers and senior executives day-in and day-out, all I hear about these days is ‘we need to be more agile,’ ‘Agile is the new digital’ and other various praises of Agile management.
For those of us that have been in the world of business for a long time, once something gets this popular, it is healthy to be a little skeptical that the bubble might soon burst, and we’ll be on to the next new trend.
What makes something a fad?
A management fad is a collective belief, disseminated by trend setters, that a management technique will lead to progress. In the last 20 years, we have seen many fads ranging from business process engineering (BPR), balanced scorecards, knowledge management to ambidextrous organizations. While many of them have created buzz, they were often cyclical phenomena and reactions to external events. For example, in the 90s, business process engineering which focuses on rethinking and redesigning the way we work came about as a reaction to the economic crisis.
Agility seems to be THE hot topic in management right now, but it is also somewhat reactionary. New entrants and companies from emerging markets are arriving on the scene and challenging once dominant players. Tech sector companies are moving into all industries and increasing the speed at which traditional competitors need to respond.
Let’s look at a few statistics that illustrate these changes:
- A third of Fortune 500-companies in 1970 were gone by 1983. And many of those that were in the top-10 in 2015, didn’t even exist ten years before that.
- The “topple rate” at which big companies lose their leadership positions, has more than doubled, suggesting that “winners” have increasingly precarious positions.
- Product vitality rates, which measure the percentage of revenues coming from new products during a certain time – usually three years – are going up.
In addition, work priorities are changing. Companies are going from having employees with fixed employment contracts and life-long company affiliation to hiring a project-based, temporary work force. And digital challenges are diluting both the time and space of work engagements. Another important reason behind all the hype agility is getting is partly created and reinforced by those who stand to benefit the most from it – management consultants. Today, nearly every major consultancy firm has something to say about agility.
Does that mean we are all trapped into believing that the business world needs agile management practices while we should be less susceptible to the crazy ideas hatched by gurus and consultants?
Probably not. Agile goes back a lot further than the last five years of consultants paying attention to it. The founding fathers started with the Agile Manifesto in 2001. At its core, Agile practices help companies focus on rapid delivery of business value. While Agile originates in software development and involves a time boxed, iterative approach to software delivery in an incremental manner right from the beginning, it has extended beyond this to include a way of organizing using tribes, squads, etc., an underlying methodology (Scrum, XP, Kanban and others) and leadership behaviors. The methodologies used in Agile management are based on continuous improvement, flexibility, team input, and delivering high-quality results.
Agile management often starts by looking at a customer’s needs. User involvement is encouraged, providing visibility and transparency, showing the actual progress of projects. The Agile method is all about iterative planning, making it very easy to adapt when some requirements change. The fact that there is continuous planning and feedback through the process means that teams start delivering business value from the beginning of the project.
Should all companies introduce agile practices? And change the way the whole organization works?
Whether or not a company adopts Agile depends on its context. In industries with long product development cycles and long product life cycles, the urgency of agile practices might be slightly lower. Therefore, companies with these characteristics can start to experiment with agile on limited projects such as product development, digital solutions or IT projects.
But if your organization is exposed to fast cycle times with a heavy level of digitalization and software development efforts across multiple functions then agility may actually be core to your survival. This requires adopting not only Agile methods but organizing using Agile structures and developing leaders to exhibited Agile behaviors.
Bettina Büchel is Professor of Strategy and Organization at IMD.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
The increasing datafication of the workplace is often cast as a means of imposing organisational and managerial control on workers. This reflection...
On 4 August 2020, one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history destroyed the port of Beirut and most of the city, killing 238 and wounding ...
Use-of-the-past research has advanced our understanding of how top managers instrumentalize past knowledge, events, and rhetorical constructions to...
In 1983, Korean Air Lines Flight KE007, a Boeing 747, suffered a tragic fate that claimed the lives of all 269 passengers and crew. Against the bac...
The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought the world to a standstill, with severe consequences on economic and health systems, requiring the identificati...
in Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems July 2024, vol. 36, no. 1, article 2
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-7-2520 ©2024
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in Organization Studies June 2024, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 825-853, https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406241236604
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD 1 March 2024
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in Journal of Product Innovation Management March 2024, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 347-378, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12662
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications