Article

Setting clear priorities amid complexity: The ‘tightrope walk’ of modern leadership

Executives and board members must navigate a labyrinth of priorities as they spin a dizzying array of plates, new research from the IMD Global Board Center shows. 
PRINTABLE PDF – Less than 5MB

Today, executives and board members are spinning a dizzying number of plates, creating a scenario where setting clear priorities becomes a tall task. Such a balancing act is a common theme in the executive suite and the boardroom besides, where the challenge of setting clear priorities persists.

According to newly published research from the IMD Global Board Center and executive search firm Roy C Hitchman [need link to pdf], both board members and senior executive struggle to prioritize the most impactful drivers of organizational performance.

Based on a 2023 survey of 578 respondents, 51.9% of whom were board members and 48.1% being executive team members (primarily located in Switzerland), the research highlights the travails of decision-making today.  

So, why is it so challenging for these leaders to establish clear priorities? In a nutshell: complexity. Leaders are constantly pulled in different directions by equally critical issues, characterized by uncertainty and rapid evolution, creating a labyrinth of decision-making.  

“The growing complexity in which organizations operate mean that governance is growing as a crucial differentiator of performance. To do so, it is essential that boards and executives play their distinct and complementary roles in supporting governance practices within their organization.  Quality governance relies on having the right people, structures and processes, information architecture, and governance culture in place – and  ensuring they are sufficiently resilient to conflict and disruption.” (Didier Cossin, Chaired Professor of Governance and Finance, and Founder and Director of the IMD Global Board Center)  

Today, leaders face an array of challenges beyond the traditional goal of maximizing shareholder returns. These include rising geopolitical tensions, growing regulatory complexity high inflation and interest rates, surges in populism, the constant threat of cyberattacks, and uncertainty associated with advancements in artificial intelligence  In addition, there is of course the important work of ensuring compliance and keeping up with regulation and stakeholder demands.  

To navigate this chaotic environment, strategy, innovation, and growth emerge as top areas of focus, according to the IMD/Roy C. Hitchman survey. While the importance of these areas are not surprising,  their high ranking is cause for pause. Are boards and executives playing their complementary roles effectively when it comes to strategy – or could they do more to co-create? Do they have the talent they need to innovate?   

A significant source of tension lies in balancing a well-defined strategy with the need for agility. As such, leaders need to balance the need for stability provided by a robust strategy while also retaining the ability to swiftly adjust course in response to changing circumstances. Striking the right balance between these elements requires an ability to attune to both internal and external signals – and to assess (and address) any misalignment 

Diversity and inclusion, supply chain management, as well as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues were less prominent on business leaders’ agendas, according to our survey. The lower ranking of these areas on the agenda suggests that while there is recognition of their importance, they may not yet be receiving the attention they deserve, relative to their impact on long-term sustainability and resilience. An alternative explanation could be that these have dropped in the face of considerable competitive pressure. When it comes to human capital, there is a notable divergence between board members and executives . Executives are more prone to prioritizing culture and behavior, while board members’ focus is oriented toward future leadership pipelines. 50% of board member survey respondents  are dissatisfied with their pipeline of future leaders, suggesting a perceived human capital risk. identifying internal high-potential candidates. 

But, building and strengthening the leadership pipeline is still a top priority for executives, too (ranked third among execs compared with first for boards). Retaining essential skills and fostering a healthy organizational culture and behavior are also crucial to boards and executives. The survey findings also indicate that the leadership pipeline is a major concern due to a lack of diversity and an inadequate process for identifying high potential internal candidates.  

“The most surprising finding is that 50% of the board members are unhappy with their current pipeline of future leaders. This might result in stressful cooperation between boards and executive teams and almost always limits business excellence.” (Roman Huber, Managing Partner of Roy C. Hitchman) 

 So, how do executives and board members navigate this maze of priorities? The answer lies in having the structures and processes in place to ensure a systematic approach to formulating the decisions that make a critical difference, the right information to make decisions, having the right people in place who can make sense of the information and who are able to productively discuss together in order to take decisions. Both executives and board members have essential – and complementary – roles to play to ensure that these translate into effective decisions. here is, for example, a need to better align  investment choices with strategy. Human factors are often overshadowed by technology themes like digital transformation and automation, the survey showed. Lower on the investment agenda are areas like the metaverse, alternative energy sources, and relocating operations  

Perceived deficiencies in skills and leadership also pose significant risks, raising questions about whether these survey responses reflect a perceived need for development of self or others. T A lack of specific skills in cyber, risk, digital, ESG, and technology are seen as being the highest risk areas for governance, while shareholder activism and lack of transparency are viewed as less so. . 

Additional concerns raised by respondents were leadership behavior and agility. When considering this together with continuing challenges with company culture and ongoing gender disparities, it leads to questions about the effectiveness of board members and executives in playing their respective roles in overseeing and fostering diverse and inclusive organizational cultures.  

The underrepresentation of diversity and inclusion in the current agenda highlights a gap that needs to be addressed. Organizations must prioritize creating environments where diverse talents can thrive and contribute meaningfully to the company’s success. 

Sustainability is another critical area that is lacking attention.

In conclusion, the challenge of prioritization requires a holistic approach. Executives and board members need to pay closer attention to the evolving landscape, figure out what is material to them and adjust their decision-making accordingly. Governance relies on both boards and executives to work in tandem with dedication and focus – to consistently and decisively steer organizations clear of major risks and to position themselves to seize opportunity.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Discover our latest research
IMD's faculty and research teams publish articles, case studies, books and reports on a wide range of topics