Is agility the latest management fad? Or not?
As a business school professor who deals with top management thinkers and senior executives day-in and day-out, all I hear about these days is ‘we need to be more agile,’ ‘Agile is the new digital’ and other various praises of Agile management.
For those of us that have been in the world of business for a long time, once something gets this popular, it is healthy to be a little skeptical that the bubble might soon burst, and we’ll be on to the next new trend.
What makes something a fad?
A management fad is a collective belief, disseminated by trend setters, that a management technique will lead to progress. In the last 20 years, we have seen many fads ranging from business process engineering (BPR), balanced scorecards, knowledge management to ambidextrous organizations. While many of them have created buzz, they were often cyclical phenomena and reactions to external events. For example, in the 90s, business process engineering which focuses on rethinking and redesigning the way we work came about as a reaction to the economic crisis.
Agility seems to be THE hot topic in management right now, but it is also somewhat reactionary. New entrants and companies from emerging markets are arriving on the scene and challenging once dominant players. Tech sector companies are moving into all industries and increasing the speed at which traditional competitors need to respond.
Let’s look at a few statistics that illustrate these changes:
- A third of Fortune 500-companies in 1970 were gone by 1983. And many of those that were in the top-10 in 2015, didn’t even exist ten years before that.
- The “topple rate” at which big companies lose their leadership positions, has more than doubled, suggesting that “winners” have increasingly precarious positions.
- Product vitality rates, which measure the percentage of revenues coming from new products during a certain time – usually three years – are going up.
In addition, work priorities are changing. Companies are going from having employees with fixed employment contracts and life-long company affiliation to hiring a project-based, temporary work force. And digital challenges are diluting both the time and space of work engagements. Another important reason behind all the hype agility is getting is partly created and reinforced by those who stand to benefit the most from it – management consultants. Today, nearly every major consultancy firm has something to say about agility.
Does that mean we are all trapped into believing that the business world needs agile management practices while we should be less susceptible to the crazy ideas hatched by gurus and consultants?
Probably not. Agile goes back a lot further than the last five years of consultants paying attention to it. The founding fathers started with the Agile Manifesto in 2001. At its core, Agile practices help companies focus on rapid delivery of business value. While Agile originates in software development and involves a time boxed, iterative approach to software delivery in an incremental manner right from the beginning, it has extended beyond this to include a way of organizing using tribes, squads, etc., an underlying methodology (Scrum, XP, Kanban and others) and leadership behaviors. The methodologies used in Agile management are based on continuous improvement, flexibility, team input, and delivering high-quality results.
Agile management often starts by looking at a customer’s needs. User involvement is encouraged, providing visibility and transparency, showing the actual progress of projects. The Agile method is all about iterative planning, making it very easy to adapt when some requirements change. The fact that there is continuous planning and feedback through the process means that teams start delivering business value from the beginning of the project.
Should all companies introduce agile practices? And change the way the whole organization works?
Whether or not a company adopts Agile depends on its context. In industries with long product development cycles and long product life cycles, the urgency of agile practices might be slightly lower. Therefore, companies with these characteristics can start to experiment with agile on limited projects such as product development, digital solutions or IT projects.
But if your organization is exposed to fast cycle times with a heavy level of digitalization and software development efforts across multiple functions then agility may actually be core to your survival. This requires adopting not only Agile methods but organizing using Agile structures and developing leaders to exhibited Agile behaviors.
Bettina Büchel is Professor of Strategy and Organization at IMD.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Just as individuals can reap big benefits from kicking bad habits, businesses must consider scrapping old habits, processes, and ways of thinking to reinvent themselves and stay relevant. Here are five "LIFTS" to help leaders do it.
BARCELONA, JANUARY 2023. What started in 2016 as a humble entrepreneurial attempt to contribute to a more sustainable future had turned into a solid eyewear brand present in major Western markets. François van den Abeele was even more excited by t...
Five friends created DIDA in 1983 and turned it into a global provider of IT infrastructure and services. Riding the wave of rapid growth of communication networks and increasingly global business relationships of corporations, DIDA established it...
This note, designed for use in sessions and programs on negotiation, explores five distinct negotiator types: competitor, collaborator, strategist, innovator and problem solver. Each type has unique characteristics, strengths and weaknesses that c...
This technical note introduces two powerful frameworks for navigating complex, rapidly changing business environments: TSUNAMI and SURF. The TSUNAMI framework provides a comprehensive tool for assessing external challenges across seven dimensions:...
The GreenGro (A) case explores the challenges faced by GreenGro, a mid-sized agricultural technology company, as it navigates a rapidly changing industry landscape. CEO Sarah Chen and her leadership team are confronting issues ranging from technol...
The GreenGro (B) case study is a follow-up to GreenGro (A) and details how the company applied the TSUNAMI and SURF frameworks to address its complex challenges. The case illustrates the practical implementation of these frameworks, introduced in ...
In an era of rising economic nationalism and intensifying rivalries, business leaders with extensive cross-border operations must develop sharper agility and foresight. Their ability to make informed decisions in this volatile environment hinges o...
In the newly revised second edition of Hostage at the Table: How Leaders Can Overcome Conflict, Influence Others and Raise Performance, clinical psychologist, distinguished leadership professor, and veteran hostage negotiator George Kohlrieser com...
Building on NTT (A), the case starts with NTT’s CEO having narrowed down strategic growth options with the board to prepare NTT for the future. Past international investments in AT&T Wireless and KPN to tap into foreign markets had resulted in bil...
in I by IMD Brain Circuits 24 January 2025
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
NTT Corporation, Japan’s information and communication technologies (ICT) leader since 1953, was the first to commercialize internet usage on mobile phones in the 1990s, which resulted in NTT achieving much success in Japan. However, by the end of...
Building on NTT (A), the case starts with NTT’s CEO having narrowed down strategic growth options with the board to prepare NTT for the future. Past international investments in AT&T Wireless and KPN to tap into foreign markets had resulted in bil...
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Five friends created DIDA in 1983 and turned it into a global provider of IT infrastructure and services. Riding the wave of rapid growth of communication networks and increasingly global business relationships of corporations, DIDA established it...
NTT Corporation, Japan’s information and communication technologies (ICT) leader since 1953, was the first to commercialize internet usage on mobile phones in the 1990s, which resulted in NTT achieving much success in Japan. However, by the end of...