OW Bunker (A): Denmark’s biggest IPO ever
OW Bunker, founded in 1953, was a Danish marine fuel (“bunker”) company. It was Denmark’s third largest company (measured on revenue) and the world’s largest bunker supplier until its collapse on 7 November 2014. Similar to many other commodity traders, OW Bunker’s business model was about buying the physical oil in order to sell at a later stage (“physical distribution”) OR to simply act as a broker between the physical supplier and the ship-owner (“re-selling”). In essence, the business can be characterized as a high volume/high revenue/small margin business, wherefore scale and risk management are key parameters for success. In 2007, 93.5% of the company were acquired by leading Scandinavian private equity company, Altor, and in the following years, the company grew significantly, and sales volume grew nearly 100%, from 15 million ton in 2007 to 29.6 million ton in 2013, at which time an exit was decided upon. When a private sales transaction did not succeed, Altor decided to pursuit an exit through an IPO, which with a Market Cap of about US$ 900 million, became the largest IPO in Denmark in many years.
- Board Composition essentially whether the Board had the proper experience and expertise to handle the complexity of OW Bunker and whether the rising tendency of a more hands on and involved Board, could have changed the outcome.
- Cross Country Corporate Governance, and specifically whether good Corporate Governance were followed in the case of OW Bunker and whether the meltdown likely could have been avoided or mitigated under different jurisdictions and corporate governance structures.
- Risk management and the role the lack of it played in OW Bunker, lessons learned and models that can be used to manage risks.
- The halo effect, which for OW Bunker was evident on different layers: Company itself, where shareholders believed the company would be able to continue its trajectory trend of successful results; Board of Directors, which was described in the press as a “dream team” because of successful careers and a general recognition in the public; Executive Management where the strong charismatic CEO was given too much authority and responsibility, because of his strong character and proven successful track record.
OW Bunker, Materials, Oil and Gas
March 28th, 2014 – November 7th, 2014
Cranfield University
Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]
Harvard Business School Publishing
60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]
NUCB Business School
1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]
IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
- OW Bunker (A): Denmark’s biggest IPO ever
- OW Bunker (B): From top to flop in eight months
- OW Bunker (A): Denmark’s biggest IPO ever
- OW Bunker (B): From top to flop in eight months
Case reference: IMD-7-2126 ©2019
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-7-2127 ©2019
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Here’s how your company can meet regulatory requirements and the expectations of sustainability indexes.
In times of difficulty, knowing when to get involved and learning to master your emotions are essential skills to prevent making a bad situation worse.
Test your knowledge on ESG governance with our fun quiz! Learn how strong governance drives environmental and social success in investing. Take it now!
Despite the 2019 Business Roundtable pledge to redefine capitalism for the benefit of all stakeholders, progress by companies still lags behind the rhetoric. To move the dial, we need more courageous boards.
In times of difficulty, knowing when to get involved and learning to master your emotions are essential skills to prevent making a bad situation worse, writes Axel P Lehmann.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, organizations are grappling with how best to harness its transformative power. Some are choosing to create a new senior management position with enterprisewide oversight of AI activitie...
This study addresses multiple-principal–agent power dynamics in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in emerging markets. We investigate under what conditions agents (CEOs) accede to demands of government-linked principals. Our qualitative study in Indo...
In the newly revised second edition of High Performance Boards: A Practical Guide to Improving & Energizing your Governance, author Didier Cossin delivers an incisive and practical roadmap to board governance best-practices. Accessible to professi...
Case (B) explains the contents of the Holder report, which investigated the diversity, equity and inclusion culture at Uber and ends with Travis Kalanick’s separation from the company.
Case (C) discusses the meeting that showcased the proposed actions following the Holder report recommendations and highlights the concerning response of one of the board members.
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD Magazine September 2024, no. 15, pp. 62-64
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in MIT Sloan Management Review Fall 2024, vol. 66. no. 1, pp. 62-66
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in Journal of Management Studies September 2024, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2406-2436, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12977
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case (A) recounts Travis Kalanick’s journey through the growth of Uber, highlighting instances of his problematic behavior and the board’s lack of oversight.
Case (C) discusses the meeting that showcased the proposed actions following the Holder report recommendations and highlights the concerning response of one of the board members.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case (A) recounts Travis Kalanick’s journey through the growth of Uber, highlighting instances of his problematic behavior and the board’s lack of oversight.
Case (B) explains the contents of the Holder report, which investigated the diversity, equity and inclusion culture at Uber and ends with Travis Kalanick’s separation from the company.