Unilever buys Dollar Shave Club: desperate or strategic?
Unilever announced last week that it would purchase Dollar Shave Club for $1 billion. On the surface, this may look like yet another desperate attempt by a lumbering legacy giant to buy (and overpay for) digital street cred. However, look at little more closely, and this acquisition is packed full of strategic and tactical benefits.
For as long as anyone can remember, the market for razors, or more specifically for razor blades, has been the closest thing to an annuity that exists in business. Unwanted hair stubbornly grows through all business cycles. High fixed costs and an iron grip on distribution has led to an oligopoly in most advanced markets, so the gains are shared among a few huge players. In the US, Gillette (part of P&G) and Schick (part of Energizer) have owned 80% of the market for decades.
Few people take pleasure in buying razor blades. They are expensive and the purchase experience is pretty crappy. For example, in many locations across the globe, razor blades are in locked cabinets, so that they cannot be directly taken off the shelves.
Thus, we have a great potential for disruption: high profit margins for incumbents, coupled with low cost and experience value for consumers.
Enter Dollar Shave Club
Dollar Shave Club is a the venture capital financed, quirky, social media savvy upstart, who introduced cheaper ‘good enough’ razors and blades, delivered directly to a consumer’s home. Over the past two years, company’s growth has exploded, and today it owns an estimated 10% of the US razor blade market. Dollar Shave Club achieved sales of $150 million in 2015 and expects to reach $200 million this year.
Gillette, with a 60% share of the market, took notice, but their options were limited by their incumbent position. They launched their own home delivery razor ‘club’ but maintained their margins, and thus were a lot more expensive than Dollar Shave Club. In short, they stopped short of disrupting themselves.
Enter Unilever
Without a legacy business to disrupt (Unilever is not a significant player in the razor or blade market), Unilever saw Dollar Shave Club as an entry point into a coveted market dominated by its nemesis, P&G. Unilever didn’t need to have an awkward conversation with a channel partner like Duane Read or CVS about cannibalization and channel conflict.
What happens next will be interesting to watch. How will Gillette react? How will Unilever leverage Dollar Shave Club? Will other startups, like Harry’s capitalize on this new competitive space?
Unilever looks very smart in this deal. Its own ecommerce efforts have not been spectacular, and so it will be able to learn a lot from Dollar Shave Club. Plus, it controls a large number of bathroom brands that it could leverage on the same platform as Dollar Shave Club, such as Axe, Dove, and Noxema. Dollar Shave Club combined cost and experience value, and Unilever brings a strong and robust platform into the mix. All together, Unilever now has the ingredients to build a new and powerful digitally-enabled business model.
Michael Wade is the Cisco Chair in Digital Business Transformation, and Professor of Innovation and Strategic Information Management at IMD. His interests lie at the intersection of strategy, innovation, and digital transformation.
He is Director of the Global Center for Digital Business Transformation and co-Director of IMD’s new Leading Digital Business Transformation program (LDBT) designed for business leaders and senior managers from all business areas who wish to develop a strategic roadmap for digital business transformation in their organizations.
He is also co-director of the Orchestrating Winning Performance Program (OWP).
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Once again, Donald Trump has promised bold yet unspecified moves that will add to the uncertainty facing executives. Business leaders must cut through the "policy fog" by focusing on what the re-elected President can actually control, comprehensiv...
The mention of geopolitics leads many to ask how company strategies are being reformulated to capitalize on what's left of globalization. But this overlooks a critical prior question: what's the best way for firms to track and assess geopolitical ...
Many new businesses have emerged in recent years with few employees, no roots in the community, and heavily reliant on Big Tech for survival.
Many new businesses have emerged in recent years with few employees, no roots in the community, and heavily reliant on Big Tech for survival.
Here are three strategic lessons from the tramp shipping industry.
Shipping is a unique industry, and tramp shipping is a niche sector within it. Yet, in an age of growing market disruption and uncertainty, it has some key lessons for strategic management in other industries.
Most annual predictions fail to provide actionable insights for executives. Here are two approaches to better discern the implications for your business.
Companies need clear guidance to achieve sustainable business transformation. A practical roadmap identifying drivers for effective change can make success more likely.
In June 2024, at the CocoaCrafters Operating Centre, Elena Fever faced a crucial meeting with the board of directors. The discussion surrounded how to integrate Generative AI (GenAI) into the company’s supply chain strategy to enhance forecasting ...
Strategic thinking is widely acknowledged as a critical leadership capability, yet many executives struggle to consistently prioritize it.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD 13 January 2025
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-7-2593 ©2024
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications