HomeResearch & Knowledgeback to HomeStrategyback to Research & KnowledgeHas Elon Musk X’d out?back to Strategy

Case Study

Has Elon Musk X’d out?

By Stefan Michel and Kathe Sweeney

23 pages

February 2024

Reference: IMD-7-2537

In 2022, Elon Musk, known for his innovative ideas and often compared to Steve Jobs, made a big move by buying Twitter for $44 billion. He then started transforming the microblogging platform, rebranding it as “X.” His goal was to turn Twitter into a super app like WeChat in Asia, combining many services like messaging, shopping and payments into one platform. This change was aimed at making Twitter more than just a place to post short messages, but a hub for various digital activities. The case study explores why Musk decided to take this bold step. It looks at the benefits he expected by bringing different digital services together. However, Musk faced many challenges during this transformation. The study discusses the impact of his decisions, including cutting down the workforce, changing policies and the reactions from users, advertisers and regulators. These issues show how difficult it is to change a well-known social media platform. Additionally, the study examines the problems Musk encountered in trying to make Twitter like WeChat in Western countries, where the digital environment is different from Asia. It considers what this big change could mean for the future of social media, online privacy and e-commerce, suggesting how this kind of transformation could change the way people use digital platforms. In short, “Has Elon Musk X’d Out?” provides a detailed look at Elon Musk’s attempt to reshape Twitter. It gives insights into the challenges of creating a super app in the West and discusses the transformation’s possible effects on the digital and social media world.

Learning Objective

Analyze the business model of an organization before and after a transformation.
Assess if the mission and the business model of an organization are aligned.
Analyze the elements of a new brand using Keller’s brand pyramid.
Infer the leadership style of a leader based on public statements and their actions.
Discuss how the mission (why?), the business model (what?) and the leadership style (how?) are interrelated.

Keywords

Strategy, Digital Transformation, Entrepreneurship, General Management, Leadership, Organizational Behavior, Social Media, Business Model, Silicon Valley, Musk, Elon

Settings

World/global, United States of America
X (Former Twitter), Social Media
2022-2023

Type

Published Sources

Available Languages

English

Related material

Teaching note

IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Keep reading

Article

Optimizing omnichannel assortments and inventory provisions under the multichannel attraction model

Assortment optimization presents a complex challenge for retailers, as it depends on numerous decision factors. Changes in assortment can result in demand redistribution with multi-layered consequences. This complexity is even more pronounced for ...

General Management

By Andrey Vasilyev, Sebastian Maier and Ralf W. Seifert

in European Journal of Operational Research

August 2025, vol. 324, no. 3, pp. 799-813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.035

Article

Pride without apology: Corporate inclusion in challenging times - IbyIMD

LGBTQ+ corporate inclusion faces backlash in 2025 as companies roll back DE&I policies. Business leaders share strategies for maintaining inclusive workplaces, authentic leadership, and effective allyship programs despite political pressures and r...

Diversity and Equity and Inclusion Human Resources Leadership Work-life Balance

By Alexander Fleischmann

in I by IMD

Article

Only connect: How to keep disparate workforce elements happy and motivated - IbyIMD

Today’s workforce often includes a mix of permanent employees, freelancers, and outside contractors – but even organizations with mostly external workforces or highly autonomous workforces need proximity to succeed over the long term. Here are fou...

Strategy Team

By Sebastian Reiche

in I by IMD

Article

How to win your audience back when things go wrong – the Diamond of Dissent - IbyIMD

Few things are scarier than being at the front of the room and losing your audience. Consult the checklist of questions below to understand why people are reacting negatively to what you are saying and use the ‘Diamond of Dissent’ to win them back...

Leadership

By Robert Vilkelis

in I by IMD

Case Study

Has Nike lost its stride?

Marketing Digital Strategy

By Ivy Buche and Goutam Challagalla

Video

The end of corporate passivity

Corporate leaders must stop being passive spectators and actively shape geopolitical outcomes to drive global competitiveness and collaboration.

Competitiveness Corporate Governance Decision Making Leadership Politics Strategy

By Arturo Bris

in I by IMD

Optimizing omnichannel assortments and inventory provisions under the multichannel attraction model

By Andrey Vasilyev Sebastian Maier and Ralf W. Seifert
in European Journal of Operational Research August 2025, vol. 324, no. 3, pp. 799-813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.01.035

Summary

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

General Management

Browse all topics

Pride without apology: Corporate inclusion in challenging times - IbyIMD

By Alexander Fleischmann
in I by IMD

Summary

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Diversity and Equity and Inclusion

Human Resources

Leadership

Work-life Balance

Browse all topics

Only connect: How to keep disparate workforce elements happy and motivated - IbyIMD

By Sebastian Reiche
in I by IMD

Summary

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Strategy

Team

Browse all topics

Has Nike lost its stride?

By Ivy Buche and Goutam Challagalla
Case reference: IMD-7-2598 ©2025

Summary

Set in 2024, the case describes the trajectory of Nike's success and how it had recently lost its way. The company was experiencing its worst slump in more than 10 years. Since 2020, CEO Donahoe oversaw a significant shift away from wholesale, with a focus on direct channels and a suite of apps. However, direct-to-consumer (DTC) sales failed to make up for the losses from previous wholesale partners. At the same time, competition from a new breed of smaller players increased. Critics claimed that the sportswear giant's product innovations had lagged, allowing nimble competitors to chisel away at its market share. Sales were flat or down in all geographies. In response, Donahoe announced a three-year, $2 billion cost cutting plan that involved laying off 2% of workers, which in turn created a sense of crisis at Nike. Investors also suffered as the stock performed worse than the broader market in the last three years. To make matters worse, a class action suit was filed against Donahoe and CFO Matthew Friend for misleading the market about the company's underperformance. How could Nike's top management team execute a strategic turnaround by building upon the company's core strengths of brand equity, product innovation and sports marketing? They had to reevaluate past strategies, rethink their assumptions and chart a comeback to restore the company to its former growth trajectory and market dominance.

Reference IMD-7-2598

Organization Nike

Industry Consumer Goods, Footwear

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Marketing

Digital

Strategy

Browse all topics

The end of corporate passivity

By Arturo Bris
in I by IMD

Summary

Corporate leaders must stop being passive spectators and actively shape geopolitical outcomes to drive global competitiveness and collaboration.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Competitiveness

Corporate Governance

Decision Making

Leadership

Politics

Strategy

Browse all topics

Reviewing strategy-execution capabilities

By Xavier Gilbert
Case reference: IMD-3-2428 ©2025

Summary

A "radar chart" is proposed to visualize where the company needs to improve. It can also be used to support the discussion of any group of executives on the reasons for failure of most strategic initiatives; they may do that by assessing their own company against the six proposed required capabilities and by comparing notes with each other. The six required capabilities are: 1) Companies need to have a clear and well-communicated strategy, with clear and well-communicated strategic priorities, to which strategic initiatives contribute in a clear and well-communicated way. 2) Companies need to have a cadre of executives at different levels selected for their entrepreneurial and action-learning capabilities. 3) Companies need to understand and encourage action-learning and know how to plan execution accordingly. 4) Companies need to have an inclusive approach to execution. 5) Companies need to be serious about follow-through and see it as an essential part of action-learning. 6) Companies need to realize that, in the end, lack of respect for people, is a sure cause for execution failure. These capabilities are described at length in the book Smarter Execution, published by IMD (also available from Amazon UK). Learning objectives: This note is very effective to support a group discussion on the execution capabilities of a company. It can be used by a senior management team before they decide to launch strategic initiatives; it can be used as part of a kick-off workshop when launching a strategic initiative; or it can be used along the way during execution to identify and correct execution frustrations.

Reference IMD-3-2428

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

General Management

Browse all topics