HomeResearch & Knowledgeback to HomeStrategyback to Research & KnowledgeIs Intel’s business model fit for the future?back to Strategy

Case Study

Is Intel’s business model fit for the future?

By Stefan Michel, Kirill Astapov, Tania Correia Baptista, Pavel Vagero and Takeshi Yamada

19 pages

May 2020

Order this case study

Reference: IMD-7-2154

In 2018 Intel celebrates 50 years in business amidst “a corporate transformation as we grow beyond our traditional PC and server businesses into data-rich markets addressing the explosive demands to process, analyze, store, and transform data.” In this case, we will look into the history of Intel and the semiconductor Industry background, which provide a starting framework to compare the business models and value chain of Intel and one of Its competitors, ARM. A closer look at previous moves shows that Intel has made bets in many different fields which today are successful and yet is still struggling. Competitors such as ARM seemed to have a more agile value chain and reaped its benefits In [he past. However, ARM also seems to be stagnating, thus raising doubts whether its model is really a map to follow. In this context, it js unclear whether Intel is agile enough to respond to changes in the industries it operates in. Considering the industry environment, what strategy should be chosen based on challenges in environment and existing resources and capabilities? Robert Noyce, one of the company’s founders, advised: “Don’t be encumbered by hist01Y, go off and do something wonderful.” So what will the next wonderful thin be for Intel?

Learning Objective

Analyze competitive advantage, resource and capability in microprocessor industry.
Analyze strategic business model shift from successful traditional vertical integrated model to more agile models.
Apply Porter’s 5 Forces Competition Framework for Intel, identify KSF In semiconductor industry, understand the role of resources and key competences for future development of the company, as well as acquisition as possibility to gain new competences.

Keywords

Strategy, Business Model, Innovation

Settings

United States of America
Intel, Materials, Semiconductors
2015 2019, with history references that go back to 1968

Type

Published Sources

Available Languages

English

Related material

Teaching note

IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Best-selling Case Study

Keep reading

Case Study

Entrepreneurship through acquisition: Sébastien Perroud and the IAR Group

Entrepreneurship Finance Strategy

By Benoit F. Leleux, Dominik Hanslin, Iuliia Mordacheva, Matthias Rey and Frank Schuster

Case Study

Mastercard 2023: Rewired for infinite optionality

Disruption Digital Strategy

By Howard H. Yu, Mark J. Greeven and Martin Králik

Article

Management myth-busters: Does culture really eat strategy for breakfast?

Culture eats strategy for breakfast is one of the most enduring truisms of management. But is it really the case? And what is culture anyway?

Organizational Culture Strategy

By Michael R. Wade

in I by IMD

8 November 2024

Article

Drei Ideen, um die Kostenexplosion im Gesundheitswesen wirklich zu dämpfen

The total costs of the Swiss healthcare system are rapidly approaching the CHF 100 billion mark per year. Now Switzerland is voting on November 24 on a further reform step. But that will not be enough. New ideas are needed.

Strategy Change Management Disruption

By Alix Rey and Romain de Luze

in NZZamSonntag

31 October 2024

Article

Strategy stack: An integrated approach to decision-making

The ways popular frameworks are used fall short in today’s rapidly changing environment. Here is a new way to make better-informed strategic choices.

Change Management Competitiveness Decision Making Innovation Strategy

By Albrecht Enders, Ajay K. Kohli, Andreas König and Arnaud Chevallier

in I by IMD

Case Study

Bossard’s AI strategy for proven productivity (Cartoon case)

Bossard, a Swiss company founded in 1731, has successfully transitioned from a product-centric approach to one that offers services and solutions. It has achieved significant revenue growth despite economic challenges. Its brand promise, “proven p...

Artificial Intelligence Business Transformation Strategy

By Stefan Michel

Case Study

The AI paradox: Will generative AI enhance or destroy the business model of 99designs.com? (Cartoon case)

99designs.com is a global platform connecting freelance designers with potential clients. The case study examines the potential impact of generative AI on 99designs’ business model. The platform uses a crowdsourcing approach that invites designers...

Strategy Business to Business Digital Disruption

By Stefan Michel

Article

How CEO’s drive saved car giant Ford from the scrapyard

Companies desperately in need of a turnaround in fortunes should take inspiration from the 2008 rescue mission by the then-new Ford boss Alan Mulally.

Agility Business Transformation Change Management Competitiveness Decision Making Future Readiness Leadership Organizational Culture Performance Management Strategy

By Howard H. Yu

in I by IMD

Report

Nature's ROI: Five key enablers for building a nature-positive business strategy

As the global environmental crisis reaches unprecedented levels, businesses face mounting pressure to act. But this challenge is also a major business opportunity. The companies that move quickly to tackle biodiversity loss will not only protect o...

Sustainability Strategy

By Julia Katharina Binder, Adrian Dellecker and Aurélie V. Stamm

IMD Center for Sustainable and Inclusive Business Report, October 2024

Entrepreneurship through acquisition: Sébastien Perroud and the IAR Group

By Benoit F. Leleux Dominik Hanslin Iuliia Mordacheva Matthias Rey and Frank Schuster
Case reference: IMD-7-2515 ©2024

Summary

GENEVA (SWITZERLAND), AUGUST 2021. There was a lot at stake for Sébastien. This was the culmination of his 18-month NCA supported search journey to find a company to acquire. Instead of a single target, he was now faced with the prospect of acquiring 4 separate companies at once, consolidating them into a group. One, SAS, was bigger than the others but also faced significant financial issues. Hopefully he had identified three additional companies as acquisition targets, all profitable and with low levels of debt but individually a bit too small. Should he pursue all three as a single deal or add SAS for a four-company deal? In a last-ditch effort to figure out the best deal configuration, he ran some simulations about the potential returns of the group with and without the SAS turnaround. With those projections in hand, it was time to finalize the management buy-in proposal to present to the investment committee the following week.

Reference IMD-7-2515

Organization IAR Group

Industry Finance and Insurance, Private Equity

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Entrepreneurship

Finance

Strategy

Browse all topics

Mastercard 2023: Rewired for infinite optionality

By Howard H. Yu Mark J. Greeven and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-7-2455 ©2024

Summary

In the 2010s, card processing – Mastercard’s flagship service – started showing signs of commodification as new, nimble players (typically, fintech startups thriving on digital) entered the payment processing space, and customer preferences evolved beyond plastic cards and traditional contact payments. To re-energize its central position and its ability to capture value, Mastercard – as the incumbent – had to make bold decisions. The case details Mastercard’s approach to conceptualizing and building a global platform ecosystem that upholds the principles and design elements of modularity (i.e. interoperability and scalability) and optionality. Today, Mastercard's services, based on application programming interfaces (APIs), integrate with a variety of platforms and offer flexibility to businesses that require customized payment solutions. All along, the company has accommodated a high level of internal disruption. The case also explores the nature of Mastercard’s systematic collaboration with fintechs – players that often started out as competitors in specific parts of Mastercard’s value chain. It describes the company’s engagement with fintechs as fostering collaboration and co-creation and facilitating access; in other words, opening doors and sharing tools with partners. The case presents observations and quotes by CEO Michael Miebach, whose career trajectory at Mastercard – spanning Africa & Middle East experience, fintech partnerships, product management and the CEO role – sheds additional light on the philosophy and values that have driven the company’s transformation to a technology powerhouse and self-described original fintech.

Reference IMD-7-2455

Organization Mastercard

Industry Finance and Insurance, Financial Services

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Disruption

Digital

Strategy

Browse all topics